Mark Hall Mark Hall's 프로필 페이지

Mark Hall Mark Hall

0 등록한 코스 • 0 코스 완료

전기

NAHQ CPHQ最新考題 - CPHQ在線考題

一直想要提升自身的你，有沒有參加CPHQ認證考試的計畫呢？如果你想參加這個考試，你準備怎麼準備考試呢？也許你已經找到了適合自己的參考資料了。那麼，什麼資料有讓你選擇的價值呢？你選擇的是不是VCESoft的CPHQ考古題？如果是的話，那麼你就不用再擔心不能通過考試了。

CPHQ 認證考試是一個具有挑戰性和嚴格的考試，需要廣泛的準備和學習。候選人必須具有對醫療保健質量管理原則和實踐的深刻理解，以及將其應用於現實情況的能力。該考試旨在評估候選人在醫療保健質量管理方面的知識、技能和能力，通過考試表明候選人已達到 NAHQ 設定的嚴格標準。

>> NAHQ CPHQ最新考題 <<

CPHQ在線考題 & CPHQ題庫

面對激烈競爭，每個大學生都在為使自己在人才市場上脫穎而出而努力，多一張國際通行證無疑是為他們在就業及其他競爭中在同學中脫穎而出的法寶。所以，通過 NAHQ 的 CPHQ 考試認證是我人生中的一大挑戰，需要拼命的努力學習，不過不要緊，你可以購買VCESoft NAHQ 的 CPHQ 考試認證培訓資料，幫你輕松通過考試。

NAHQ CPHQ認證考試旨在評估負責確保醫療服務質量的醫療保健專業人員的知識和技能。該考試涵蓋了廣泛的主題，包括醫療保健提供系統，績效衡量和改進，患者安全，風險管理以及醫療保健法規和標準。

CPHQ考試旨在為從事質量改善、患者安全、風險管理或績效測量的醫療保健專業人員設計。考試涵蓋了廣泛的主題，包括質量管理、患者安全、數據管理、醫療保健法規和標準，以及領導力和溝通。該考試由140道多項選擇題組成，考生有3個小時的時間完成。

最新的 CPHQ Certification CPHQ 免費考試真題 (Q65-Q70):

問題 #65
The most important initial step in preparing for an accreditation survey is

A. Clinical quality improvement activities
B. Teaching tools and methods of performance improvement
C. Physician credentialing
D. Multidisciplinary standards education

答案：D

解題說明：
Preparing for an accreditation survey requires ensuring all staff understand and comply with standards, which is foundational for readiness.
Option A (Teaching tools and methods of performance improvement): PI tools are part of ongoing quality efforts, not the initial survey preparation step.
Option B (Physician credentialing): Credentialing is a specific compliance area, not the broadest initial step.
Option C (Clinical quality improvement activities): QI activities support compliance but are ongoing, not the initial focus.
Option D (Multidisciplinary standards education): This is the correct answer. The NAHQ CPHQ study guide states, "The initial step in accreditation survey preparation is multidisciplinary education on standards to ensure all staff understand requirements" (Domain 4). This builds a foundation for compliance.
CPHQ Objective Reference: Domain 4: Performance and Process Improvement, Objective 4.7, "Prepare for accreditation surveys," emphasizes standards education. The NAHQ study guide notes, "Educating staff on standards is the first step in survey readiness" (Domain 4).
Rationale: Standards education ensures organization-wide readiness, aligning with CPHQ's accreditation principles.
Reference: NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Domain 4: Performance and Process Improvement, Objective 4.7.

問題 #66
A study was performed to compare quality outcomes between case/care managed groups and non- case/care managed groups tor elective coronary artery bypass.
The results are as follows:

What is the median length of stay (or non-case/care managed patients?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3

答案：A

解題說明：
To find the median length of stay for the non-case/care managed patients from the data provided, we need to arrange the lengths of stay in numerical order and identify the middle value.
Here are the lengths of stay for non-case/care managed patients:
Case 6: 7 days
Case 7: 7 days
Case 8: 8 days
Case 9: 9 days
Case 10: 19 days
Since there are five patients, the median will be the middle value in this ordered list. Placing the lengths of stay in order: 7, 7, 8, 9, 19 The third value in this list is the median because it is in the middle: 7, 7, 8, 9, 19

問題 #67
A healthcare quality professional has identified sepsis as a high-volume, high-cost patient condition. After 12 months of initiating a sepsis care bundle, the following length-of-stay (LOS) data was analyzed:
Length of Stay for Sepsis Diagnosis
Month
Previous Year
Current Year
Jan
3
2
Feb
5
6
Mar
8
6
Apr
12
5
May
9
8
Jun
14
4
Jul
8
8
Aug
8
8
Sep
12
9
Oct
6
6
Nov
8
10
Dec
9
6
The governing body has asked for a report on the outcome. Which of the following should be reported and how?

A. There has been an average LOS decrease; present using a side-by-side Pareto chart
B. There has been an average LOS increase; display with a run chart
C. There has been an average LOS increase; present using a side-by-side bar graph
D. There has been an average LOS decrease; display with a control chart

答案：D

解題說明：
Step-by-Step Explanation:1. Objective:Evaluate whether the sepsis care bundle improved patient outcomes by reducing Length of Stay (LOS).
2. Compare Averages:Month
Previous Year LOS
Current Year LOS
Difference
Jan
3
2
-1
Feb
5
6
+1
Mar
8
6
-2
Apr
12
5
-7
May
9
8
-1
Jun
14
4
-10
Jul
8
8
0
Aug
8
8
0
Sep
12
9
-3
Oct
6
6
0
Nov
8
10
+2
Dec
9
6
-3
Previous Year: (3+5+8+12+9+14+8+8+12+6+8+9) / 12 = 8.5 days
Current Year: (2+6+6+5+8+4+8+8+9+6+10+6) / 12 = 6.75 days
Average LOS:## Result: LOS decreased by 1.75 days on average
A control chart is used to track variation over time and identify special cause vs. common cause variation.
This project evaluates process stability and performance before and after an intervention (sepsis care bundle).
It helps answer: Is the reduction statistically significant or just random?
Why a Control Chart?
A: Incorrect: LOS decreased, not increased; bar graphs don't show variation over time.
B: Incorrect: While LOS decreased, Pareto charts are for identifying priorities based on frequency-not trend over time.
D: Incorrect: LOS did not increase; run charts show trends but lack the statistical power of control charts to detect special cause variation.
Why the other options are incorrect:

問題 #68
Which of the following is the appropriate group to review care delivered by an individual physician to a patient who suffered a serious adverse event?

A. governing body
B. bioethics committee
C. peer review committee
D. quality council

答案：C

解題說明：
The appropriate group to review the care delivered by an individual physician to a patient who suffered a serious adverse event is the peer reviewcommittee. The peer review process is a critical component of healthcare quality and safety, designed to ensure that physicians provide care that meets established standards.
Peer Review Committee's Role: This committee is composed of medical professionals who have the expertise and qualifications to assess the clinical performance of their peers. The review is confidential and focuses on evaluating the quality of care provided, adherence to established clinical guidelines, and the identification of any deviations from standard practices.
Assessment of Serious Adverse Events: In the case of a serious adverse event, it is essential to determine whether the care delivered was appropriate or if there were errors or omissions that contributed to the event.
The peer review committee is tasked with conducting this detailed analysis, identifying root causes, and recommending actions to prevent future occurrences.
Ensuring Accountability and Improvement: The peer review process also ensures that physicians are held accountable for their actions while providing a pathway for continuous improvement. If deficiencies are found, the committee can suggest corrective actions, additional training, or other measures to enhance patient safety.
Comparison with OtherOptions:
Quality Council: Typically focuses on broader quality improvement initiatives across the organization, rather than the specific review of individual cases.
Governing Body: Oversees the organization at a high level and would not typically be involved in the detailed clinical review of individual cases.
Bioethics Committee: Focuses on ethical dilemmas in patient care but does not perform clinical performance reviews.
References: (Based on Healthcare Quality NAHQ documents and resources)
National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ), CPHQ Study Guide, Chapter on Peer Review Processes.
NAHQ Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice, Section on Peer Review.
Quality Management in Health Care, Article on Roles of Peer Review Committees.
=========

問題 #69
The health quality professional recognizes that which of the following events should be reported to regulatory or accreditation organizations?

A. Patient fall
B. Patient grievance
C. Wrong-site surgery
D. Medication error

答案：C

解題說明：
Certain adverse events in healthcare must be reported to regulatory or accreditation organizations such as The Joint Commission (TJC), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and state health departments.
Reporting these events helps in improving patient safety, reducing harm, and ensuring compliance with quality standards.
Among the options, wrong-site surgery (Option B) is a sentinel event and must be mandatorily reported to The Joint Commission and other regulatory bodies.
Understanding Sentinel Events
A sentinel event is a serious, preventable adverse event that results in severe harm or death. According to The Joint Commission, wrong-site surgeries are considered a Never Event, meaning they should never occur in a well-functioning healthcare system.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* Medication error (Option A):
* Medication errors are common, but not all require mandatory reporting unless they lead to severe patient harm or death.
* Some state agencies and CMS may require reporting depending on severity.
* Patient fall (Option C):
* Falls are a significant safety issue but only require reporting if they result in serious injury or death.
* Organizations like CMS require reporting of falls that lead to fractures, head injuries, or major harm.
* Patient grievance (Option D):
* While patient grievances should be tracked internally, they do not require mandatory reporting unless they involve safety concerns leading to serious harm.
Thus, Option B (Wrong-site surgery) is the correct answer because it is classified as a sentinel event requiring immediate regulatory reporting.
References:
* The Joint Commission (TJC) Sentinel Event Policy
* Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) Reporting
* National Quality Forum (NQF) "Never Events" List

問題 #70
......

CPHQ在線考題: https://www.vcesoft.com/CPHQ-pdf.html

Mark Hall Mark Hall

전기

인기코스

연락처 정보